| |
|
25 Dec 1996 02:11:18 GMT
<59q2g6$4kf@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Why do the planets continue to revolve?
25 Dec 1996 02:12:29 GMT
<59q2id$ond@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>
Eric Kline CANNOT DEFEND his Newton Argument - Response #
4
25 Dec 1996 02:13:20 GMT
<59q2k0$bil@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com>
Re: The "zeta" in ZetaTalk
25 Dec 1996 02:14:20 GMT
<59q2ls$ejd@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Eric Kline CANNOT DEFEND his Newton Argument -
Response # 2
25 Dec 1996 02:15:00 GMT
<59q2n4$gkb@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Who (or what) are the "Zetas"?
25 Dec 1996 02:15:46 GMT
<59q2oi$gkl@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
Re: The "zeta" in ZetaTalk
25 Dec 1996 02:17:15 GMT
<59q2rb$qcq@sjx-ixn10.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Why do the planets continue to revolve?
25 Dec 1996 02:18:12 GMT
<59q2t4$62l@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Why do the planets continue to revolve?
25 Dec 1996 02:18:54 GMT
<59q2ue$n9g@sjx-ixn5.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Why NEWTON IS A GOD
25 Dec 1996 02:20:01 GMT
<59q30h$947@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Eric Kline CANNOT DEFEND his Newton Argument - My
$.02
25 Dec 1996 18:47:41 GMT
<59rssd$ko7@sjx-ixn8.ix.netcom.com>
PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 1
25 Dec 1996 18:48:55 GMT
<59rsun$p2j@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 2
25 Dec 1996 21:27:18 GMT
<59s67m$d28@sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>
Re: Who (or what) are the "Zetas"?
25 Dec 1996 21:26:02 GMT
<59s65a$akt@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>
PERTURBATIONS - the Zetas Explain - # 3
