ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for December 11, 2010
align="right" hspace="0" width=356 height=348>I know that the Zetas have said, repeatedly, that all of Central America is a high danger zone, but could they please go into some more detail about what the individual countries can expect? Mexico and Guatamala have greater land mass, so presumably will have some safe zones. However, as one moves south, the land steadily narrows until it gets to Panama, a mere isthmus. I have many friends still living in Costa Rica and Panama, whom I have tried to convince to leave (as I did). But all have said, "no, I'm at high altitude, or in a non-volcanic zone, or it can't be that bad, or you're spouting too much doom and gloom, or it's happening in the Caribbean islands, not here on the mainland", etc. etc. denial, denial. Are there any survivable areas at all in either Costa Rica or Panama, and if so, where exactly? Some of these people are at least open-minded enough to be following your weekly newsletter and would read about safe zones (if any) that they could head toward. And if they read descriptions of events that are pointedly closer to home (combined with the upcoming 7 of 10 events), maybe they'll finally be convinced.
align="bottom" width=369 height=310>
Where have we failed? We have used words like fractured, crumbled, crunched, experiencing great trauma, dragged along, or ground up. In addition to what will
happen to the land mass, we have mentioned exploding volcanoes very near at hand, and water rushing completely over such lowlands as the Yucatan and Panama.
How have we failed to relay what is coming? If total destruction does not occur during the 7 of 10, it will during the hour of the pole shift if not before that time. We
have described the 7 of 10 as moving the top of S American Plate 250 miles to the west. Not all this movement involves S America, due to adjustments elsewhere,
but nevertheless Panama and Costa Rica will be crushed during the 7 of 10 by the grinding movement of the hump as the great S American Plate grinds over it.
Does this bring to mind a ride in a car with a bad set of shocks? The land before you will heave up, up to several hundred feet high, and tumble toward you. This is an example of what we mean by "crumbled". Landslides caused by rain and steep hillsides is not a preview of what to expect! The entire mountain may sheer off and slide into valleys, crushing not just a village or road but all civilization for dozens of miles in either direction, buried under so much rock that rescue is unthinkable. Valleys will simply fold, the mountain ranges coming together and squeezing all life out between them. Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Honduras hardly fare better, though the hump of S America does not grind over them. Rock strata torn apart is not local, but has a reach. They will crumple also, but to a lesser extent during the 7 of 10.
The X-37B is back in the news. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11911335 Originally launched on April 22nd 2010, this U.S. Military space plane, supposed to be the replacement for the Shuttle series of space vehicles, has just returned (December 3, 2010) from a 7 month voyage orbiting Earth. We know that it was probably tasked with observing Planet X, yet at the same time, we know that the I.S.S. can do that, so why the X-37B? Would the Zetas care to comment on this mission, the fact that it was 7 months long and what potential capability it would have that the I.S.S. would not have in observing Planet X?
align="bottom" width=358 height=240>
This is an unmanned version of the shuttle, intended to replace an unmanned ISS in the future. That this test run took 7 months is an example of what is to come. Those on the ISS, as we have mentioned, consider themselves on a suicide mission, what with the Planet X debris slinging in at an increasing rate. Stress, and breakdowns, are already evident among NASA personnel, and the stress on the ISS personnel is extreme. At some point the announcement will be made that the crew of the ISS has been returned to Earth, citing repairs on the ISS needed and threatening the safety of the crew, though the real reason will be the increasing traffic in debris. The public may be informed long after this move is made, unless the ISS itself is struck before such a rescue can be done.
I've been hearing sonic booms near my home, one was too close to my home it slightly shooked the house. For such a close boom, if it's due to some plate movement, is there any relation between it with the future effects of any plate movement to the area in such too close a range (other than its effects to weak structures)?
Booms are caused by one of several phenomena, all related to plate stress and adjustment. One result is that due to an adjustments elsewhere a ripple travels
through the land, the type of ripple that many report seeing during an earthquake. Close to the epicenter of an earthquake, such ripples are waves of land (above or
below the waves). The troughs are deep, the crests high, and land is seen rumpling up many feet into the air and traveling during earthquakes, a horrifying view.
The farther from the epicenter the more spread out the waves, so the crests and troughs are slight and the waves have a long distance from each other. This causes
one type of boom, where a dropping or heaving ground causes the air above to clap as it rushes to fill a void. Clapping air is of course what causes thunder claps,
but there the void is caused by superheated air from a lightning flash.
Another result of adjustments elsewhere causing a boom is in the stretch zone. Land sinks because the rock supports underneath have pulled apart, and boom, the air claps. This can be land pulling apart under water too, causing the same phenomena of clapping air in the air over the water. The boom is occurring over where the land has dropped, which might relate to your safety nearby. If you are in the stretch zone, such stretch zone results as sinkholes or dropping bridges that pulled out of their moorings or meandering rivers choosing a new and lower path through the land nearby can occur. Yet another cause of booms is snapping rock. If the rock is heaving, trying to lift one section of a strata so that is has little support beneath it, then this rock strata can snap. This can also occur where compression or mountain building is occurring. Just look at that jutting rock. Something caused it to snap and jut!
Regarding women who have for a very long time been experiencing domestic violences by their husbands (and some also by their husbands' families), they (especially Asians) seem to be very loyal to such husbands due to their strongly-held religious beliefs. Most of them also said they did it because of their love for their children or their unconditinoal love for their husbands (and they indeed are showing such affections). Some even work like horses just to earn money for their unemployed able-husbands. These women seem to be STO, although when I look deeper, they actually harm more their children's state of mind--getting trapped in daily acute parents' dramas (if the children were not directly abused). Not only that, they haven't learned to empower themselves and, more than not, they affect a great deal to the detriment of their other families. As I understand it, to qualify for STO one must put their concerns on others as much as on oneself, for when one also take cares for oneself, he adds himself to the number of people available to help other people--a valuable, additional and longer help is available thus. Or, perhaps I miss something else here. When these emotionally and/or physically battered women die, in what category will they fall into: STO or undecided?
We have mentioned that those who are Service-to-Other often have lessons that they have struggled with, often for thousands and even millions of years. This does not mean they are not Service-to-Other, as no entity is perfect, and all are learning, continuously. An entity may have suffered starvation in the past, so have a tendency to hoard, even when inappropriate and actually counter to what is required of one concerned with the wellbeing of others. They may choose to blame others for the shortage, pointing fingers elsewhere, rather than admit that they themselves have a fault in this area. A common failed lesson is the lesson that courage, when facing Service-to-Self assault, is the more effective route. Cowardice abounds among the Service-to-Other, who will often try to placate the demanding Service-to-Self or move to avoid them entirely, rather than confront them. Of course, this emboldens them. The Service-to-Self must eventually learn that they can only live among each other, on prison planets, and cannot prey on others. Placating them only misleads them, giving them false hope. But courage brings its risks, as Service-to-Self rage may ensue with death or injury the result. Nevertheless, old and wise Service-to-Other have learned that an unbending confrontation is the fastest and ultimately the most effective approach, and use this almost without fail.
Can we expect any earthquake of 8-9 magnitude before end of 2010 that accompanies the tsunami caused by the bending of the tongue holding Indonesia? ../info/tinfx341.htm How would that bending plate affect the Mentawai Islands, tsunami-wise? And if there will be any tsunami, would it be higher than the 25 October tsunami in Mentawai? http://www.searo.who.int/en/Section1257/Section2263/Section2341/Section2376_15628.htm May I ask if an earthquake of 8-9 magnitude will accompany (I'm not asking before or after) Indonesia sinking before end 2010?
The Mentawai Islands will not sink entirely during the 7 of 10 scenario afflicting Indonesia, nor, surprisingly, is great tsunami expected for these islands. We have mentioned waves that clash and boil but tsunami is a large amount of water rushing in a clear direction, and this will not be happening to the leading edge that slides under the curve of the Indo-Australian Plate. What will be experienced during the 7 of 10 is a suddenly rising tide, rising rapidly. Where water rolls inland and is blocked, it will seek to go around hills and rush into inland valleys and the like, and this will bring turmoil of course, turbulent water, boiling water, arriving not only from the coast but also from inland valleys. This is our prediction for the 7 of 10, but the pole shift brings a far worse situation of course. Though there will be earthquakes proceeding and accompanying the sinking of the tongue holding Indonesia, it will not require great quakes to allow the tongue to slide. Thus the sinking will be unexpected, as the quakes will not be that notable. It is a slide, not a jolting, that will occur, and it will take place rapidly.
align="right" hspace="0" width=348 height=214>I have not found the information on the Altay mountains in safe places. It is possible to tell about them how it is told about the Ural mountains?
The Altay Mountains are at the four-corners border of Mongolia, China, Kazakstan, and Russia.
The climate will be temperate, similar to what it enjoys today. As with Mongolia
volcanic ash will not sweep the area, which will enjoy clean air. Mountain building will not occur, nor has it for many eons, as this mountain range is far enough from the Himalayas and is participating somewhat in the stretch that the Eurasian Plate will sustain. Thus, the deep lakes of eastern Russia and Kazakstan which were the result of stretch in the past.
Zetas said, that from Karachi to internal lakes of Russia there will be a new gulf. Approximately, at what width of a city of Russia it can end?
The new Eurasian Plate seaway is anticipated to run just to the east of the Iran border, going up through western Pakistan and Afghanistan and thence round along the eastern borders of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan where the lowlands are skirting the foothills of the Himalayas. It cannot run up through Karachi as Pakistan runs into the Himalayas and there are rock bonds that will not pull apart. Yet rip it must. The Eurasian Plate has lost any friction preventing movement where the African Plate formerly snugged up against it through the Mediterranean and down through the Red Sea. The Atlantic Rift has pulled apart, pulling the great Eurasian Plate to the west. To the east, where the Himalayas are glued to the Indo-Australian Plate and the Pacific Plate, there is glue and resistance to move. Thus, moving in the direction of least resistance, the Eurasian Plate rips through the lowlands skirting along the highlands, a stretch zone adjustment that is silent and only deadly to those directly above the point of tear. This has happened before to the great Eurasian Plate, as the lowlands through this middle attest.
align="right" hspace="0" width=417 height=342>What will be the consequences on the cities of Detroit, Buffalo, and Toronto during the 7/10 New Madrid adjustment?
During the 7 of 10 New Madrid adjustment the Seaway will be affected, as we mentioned earlier. It will not tear open to the degree we predicted for the pole shift itself, but weak points along the Seaway will adjust. During the 7 of 10 Duluth will find crevasses nearby, similar to the crevasse that has occurred recently in the Michigan Penninsula, but with greater depth and scope. Inland locks along the Seaway will break. Detroit and Toronto will be unaffected during the 7 of 10 except of course for earthquake damage. As the New Madrid fault line runs up along the Seaway just under the Great lakes in Ohio, cities such as Cleveland and Toledo will find their infrastructure greatly shattered in places as the rock beneath them will jut or drop, vertical adjustments. Buffalo, being virtually on the fault line, will likewise be shattered in this way, such that freeways become useless, but the seaway at Niagara Falls will remain.
Recently there is a lot of international focus on India, after the visit of President Obama, now the French president Sarkozy is also in India. Interestingly he has started his tour at the Indian space research headquarters and supported for UN seat for India. I just wonder if there is any ET connections behind this. Are the Zetas aware of any such thing? Why are all these politicians visiting India?
If Obama has made the point that the US could not be considered the solution during any flooding in Indonesia during the 7 of 10, India likewise has been given such a message. No immigration solution for almost a billion refugees from an India about to sink during the pole shift. The "what if" discussions have indeed covered all the possibilities that ZetaTalk has raised. France is known to be friendly to immigrants in the past, with very generous policies. As we have mentioned before, these matters are not discussed over the phone, but in face-to-face meetings. France was having one of those.
Did discovery channel's meteorologist Matt Hughes really commit suicide, or was there foul play? They kept a lid on it for several weeks I guess. [and from another] Matt Hughes death: Did the 'Storm Chaser' die from suicide? [Nov 4] http://www.examiner.com/tv-in-cleveland/matt-hughes-death-did-the-storm-chaser-die-from-suicide Discovery Channel executives revealed that Matt Hughes reportedly died after a "fatal injury" in his home. Online rumors suggest that Hughes died over 5 months ago in his Wichita, Kansas home after a suicide attempt.
Some sports are so dangerous, with little room for error, that they are called a "death wish". Sky diving, bungee jumping, swimming with sharks, and trying to at last be inside a tornado as it passes overhead. Matt Hughes had an ambition for the last, which he succeeded in accomplishing only a week before his suicide. As someone suffering from depression, and longing for death, he decided to do what the tornado had refused to do.
The detailed information of the 7 of 10 events, especially the European tsunami, has made me rethink my pre-PS and get-away plans. However, to get out from or to the peninsula where I live, parts of the route is at sea level, likely to be wiped out by the tsunami. To which degree can infrastructure be expected to be restored to allow local access after the tsunami? With 8 of 10 and 9 of 10 not yet described in detail, can it be expected that Europe and the Nordics will experience repeated tsunamis or other disturbances preventing infrastructure restoration? In other words, would I need to plan relocation in advance of the European tsunami? Can the time of day for the tsunami be predicted, e.g. when the mid-Atlantic Ridge is pointing towards the sun and/or PX?
align="bottom" width=511 height=599>
As we have stated, details on the 8 of 10 or 9 of 10 will not be given at present, for all the reasons we gave. Nor can we detail just when a disaster will hit, as we
have repeatedly stated. And as we stated last week, when asked how close to the last weeks might be considered safe for travel, we will never give such advice.
There will be an increasing press for hand holding as it becomes obvious to mankind that our predictions are coming true. Those who wish to cling to the comforts
of their current life - job, home, salary, and coastal location - will in particular be seeking this advice. There are a thousand variables that can apply in this matter,
and should we agree to hold the hand of anyone, more and more details would be demanded from each such individual. Should they repair the car or put those
funds into supplies? Will gasoline be available on their chosen route? Will their salary be paid until they no longer desire it? The demands would be endless.
Tsunamis scour the landscape they assault, as history retells. This is water at high speeds! What is the difference between taking a shower and being subjected to a high-pressure hose? The one caresses your skin, the other tears it off. We have described the effect on Denmark, which will be washed over by 100 foot tsunami, but the description applies elsewhere too. What the tsunami breaks, it pulls back out to sea or leaves in pieces. The 2004 tsunami striking Banda Aceh, Sumatra is a case in point. Houses simply disappeared. A bridge and pier is missing altogether. A forested area scoured out and gone. This for a tsunami up to 100 feet high. Why should a tsunami striking Norway be any less devastating?
Ever since the 7 of 10 scenario and before was disclosed, the last part of the plate movement and after the New Madrid Fault adjusts, it was said that it would unlock the San Andreas Fault which would adjust. Well, before when the Zetas spoke about the pressure the West coast was under with a bow from the Aleutian Islands down to Baja with San Diego at its center, and that this pressure would only be released when the New Madrid Adjusted they said that people in San Diego should be aware and take precautionary measures. I think that there was a sighting of several UFO's as a warning for them. Now that the 7 of 10 schedule has been detailed by the Zetas, The San Andreas Adjustment has virtually disappeared from the conversation and replaced by the North Atlantic tear and the resulting tsunami. It seems to me that it is one of two or more things. Either the San Andreas adjustment pales to the other catastrophic events in the world or that the adjustment is slight even though the fault line runs from Baja to the Puget Sound or it might be that this adjustment takes longer for the plate to move and will happen later in 2011. Could the Zetas comment?
We have been allowed to state that the European tsunami will happen almost instantly after the New Madrid adjusts. Other than indicate that a slip-side adjustment along the San Andreas will occur after this New Madrid, and occur after the Hoover Dam breaks we have not given any timing clues. Great quakes, such as magnitude 9, should not be expected, but eruptions in the West Coast volcanoes should be anticipated. A slip-slide fault line usually does not move all at once, but in a domino fashion, a bit here, a bit there.
We have all seen your depiction of the last weeks timeline, in which you describe a 7.3 week period:
9 day Severe Wobble
4.5 days static Lean to the Left
2.5 days progression toward 3 Days of Darkness.
3 Days of Darkness
6 days of Sunrise West
18 day of Slowing Rotation
6 (5.9) days of Rotation Stoppage
More recently on ZT I read this: " In addition to an obvious wobble, the lean to the left will be a certain sign. This will occur weeks before the pole shift, enough time to escape to safe locations before travel restrictions are imposed. If a distinct lean to the left occurs, this will not mean a long delay or a plateau. We have stated that from the lean to the left to the hour of the pole shift will encompass no more than 4 months, the length of a magnetic trimester, and will occur within that trimester." I am sorry to ask, but I am confused by the timing of the PS from the "lean to the left." In the last weeks timeline above there seems to be only 5-6 weeks to PS from the lean to the left. Then in the paragraph above it states that there will be no more than 4 months separating the lean to the PS. Are we talking about the same lean, and if so which timeline is more accurate? Or am I just misunderstanding this.
A Lean to the Left has already begun, from time to time, a situation we call the temporary lean to the left, a situation that appeared this past year. The temporary lean to the left, as well as the temporary lean into opposition, are slight, and not a static situation but more a trend during the daily wobble. It is a matter of degree. When describing the last weeks, we are referring to a static and also extreme Lean to the Left, such that the Earth is laid out on her side, flat out. During the Severe Wobble that precedes this, the Earth is at times flopped into that position but does not stay there, wobbles back in the other direction. Thus, because a complete flop to the left will occur during the Severe Wobble, we have on occasion shorted our description of the last weeks such that we include the Lean to the Left and the Severe Wobble together, as the start of the last weeks, in essence. When this type of flopping around starts, you are surely in the last weeks.
http://www.profi-forex.us/news/entry4000000492.html This article states that George Soros, the currency manipulating billionaire who has been a frequent guest at the White House, and is heavily involved in politics, inspiring like and dislike, and who is often blamed for monetary troubles of various economies in which he dabbles, has, with his friends, purchased 2088 tons of gold. What is this man thinking? Is this just a short term position to ride a bubble, or is there some reason gold will be worth something after the pole shift? Why don't people with that much money build a new cement plant in Montana and supply building materials for modular housing after the shift? Are there any of the 360 billionaires on earth putting money into saving people? They don't seem to be good for much as a group. Even if gold doubles and he sells it next week, what is he going to do with the cash? Do any of these people 'get' what is happening? That money spent today on vital supplies would help thousands wouldn't it?
Soros is undoubtedly putting money into gold because gold as a commodity would hold its worth regardless of what country, or currency, went down the skids. Currency is based upon and relies upon stability of the issuing country. Bonds likewise, and corporate bonds or stocks are reliant upon the stability of where the corporate assets are situated. Where ZetaTalk has an accuracy track record it is not yet sufficiently proven itself to the extent that money managers and the wealthy rely completely upon it. There are those who feel the passage might leave the Earth intact, with only a few earthquakes and high tides the worst of it. Thus, what Soros is doing is hedging his bets. Perhaps some of the disasters we are predicting might occur, with this country, or that, essentially destroyed. But if not all is destroyed, his gold lives on!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2010/dec/03/julian-assange-wikileaks In an interview Julian Assange said the following as to UFOs mentioned in State Department emails: "Many weirdos email us about UFOs or how they discovered that they were the Anti-Christ whilst talking with their ex-wife at a garden party over a pot-plant. However, as yet they have not satisfied two of our publishing rules. 1) that the documents not be self-authored; 2) that they be original. However, it is worth noting that in yet-to-be-published parts of the cablegate archive there ARE indeed references to UFOs. " Can the Zetas state what is in those UFO cables and or emails? Will they be made public? Why does Assange seem to ridicule the subject yet mention it is the subject of emails? He may have read them, and know what is in them, so do the cables and emails themselves ridicule the subject? I imagine that with Zetatalk being read around the world, and your frequent references to questions world leaders want answered, and our presidents only discussing the subject in face to face meetings with nothing on the record, that the cable or emails are actually requests for the US to explain Zetatalk. I can see a leader approaching an embassy and saying they want answers, and the employees forwarding the requests to Washington, which then does not respond in writing. Comments?
You are asking we, the Zeta, to tell you what a single human being, Assange, will decide to do in the future. As we have forever stated, matters that are in the hands of man, who has free will, cannot be accurately predicted. This is in the hands of man. Assange is stating that he has rules about what he will publish on Wikileaks re UFOs. He does not want individuals to just report what they saw, be self authored, flooding his email queue. And by stating he wants an original document he is inferring a document from the federal government, or some weighty body like that. He does not want to become another MUFON, reporting sightings. His site is about leaks, not sightings. You are also asking if the State Department takes UFOs seriously. Of course they do, but as there is a cover-up over the alien presence they are hardly going to be discussing this matter in correspondence over state matters.
The Huffington Post website recently published an article by Senator Bernie Sanders that states he was primarily responsible for getting a bill passed which required the Federal Reserve to publish how much money was given to what companies as bailouts. The amounts are incomprehensible to the average person: 21,000 transactions including: Goldman Sachs $600 Billion, Morgan Stanley $2 Trillion, Citigroup $1.8 Trillion, Bear Stearns $1 Trillion, Merrill Lynch $1.5 Trillion, GE, McDonalds, Caterpillar, Harley Davidson, Toyota, Verizon. All of which makes President Bush's Wall Street Bailout of $700 Billion seem like, as Sanders put it, 'pocket change'. And we also bailed out Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse by paying them $290 Billion each to purchase what are clearly worthless mortgage backed securities American companies sold them in the first place. Some of these banks then lent the money back to the Fed at high interest rates. I expect the Zetas will say this is a paper circus. But why? Who is fooling whom with this? Sure we have been told it is keeping the economy from falling off a cliff, but executives at these financial firms are getting bigger bonuses than before the mortgage backed security crashes. Our national debt is 14 trillion dollars, but is that a true figure, a worthwhile figure, and why? It looks like a third to a half of it was just plain handed out to the elite, and all the talk of social security being in the red, is besides the point, isn't it? Isn't this just rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic? If nothing is as we are led to believe, are not hearings in Congress on all of this a charade? As far as I can see, there is not 14 trillion anywhere. And leaders of Iraq and Afghanistan are taking 5o or more millions of US new dollars out of the countries every day and going to Dubai, which is almost bankrupt with all the spending on construction. This is all a house of cards, isn't it? I cannot believe that it can last until pole shift brings it down. More people do not have food or fuel than anytime in history and one million people are still living in tents in Haiti while a new 100 million dollar hotel is almost finished at the airport for aid workers. Isn't this disgusting?
Since the Puppet Master operates primarily in the world of finance, and others of great wealth who might be called minor puppet masters likewise do so, they all
feel that keeping the banking industry afloat is of prime importance. Why would that be? It's easy money. The banking industry makes money on transactions,
which is likewise true of stock markets and similar markets such as gold and silver markets. A bank is required to keep a certain reserve, for stability in case a run
on the bank requires them to pay out to depositors. But if stable, they are allowed to loan out multiples of what they have in savings accounts. They loan out cash
they do not have, in essence, pulling this out of thin air. Then they charge interest on the loan. This is what makes bankers fat cats. Stock brokers make money
every time stock changes hands, and if they can ramp up the value of a stock and get the market to churn, that's all the more in profits for the brokers.
We have talked about the banking system, stocks and bonds and paper money, as being a confidence game in that without confidence that the piece of paper is worth something, the game would halt. Thus, allowing bankers and credit card companies and stock brokers to tout their wares is allowed and encouraged so the public continues to participate. The public, as the cow being milked, is a necessary item. Is all this run with integrity? Whatever the motives of the guy at the top, con men and rip-off artists abound, and mostly are dealt with quietly so the public does not lose confidence in the system. Many deaths result, termed suicides, which are anything but that. When sufficient controls are not in place, such as occurred under the Bush/Cheney administration, and the house of cards threatens to collapse, revealing instability and con games and illegalities, red lights go off.
The Bush/Cheney administration deliberately allowed the housing bubble to develop. They allowed the SEC to look elsewhere so the US economy could enter a housing boom and their invasion of Iraq would be supported by taxpayer funds. Seeing that no one was watching, mortgage lenders committed all manner of atrocities, illegal at their core. By the time all this was discovered in the Fall of 2008, the house of cards collapsing around them in the Wall Street crash, a collapse of immense proportions would have resulted by simply stating the truth. The mortgage backed securities sold around the world as class A securities were virtually worthless. The infection had been spread to banks worldwide. The specter of the Great Depression loomed, with almost all banks failing and commerce halting.
The only way out was to flood the banking industry, and insurance companies that had insured them, with cash. Cash can be printed, which is what the Federal Reserve does. The M3 category on reporting, which states where the money comes from, went secret in March, 2006 - a sure sign that the printing presses were working overtime. The Federal Reserve also is funded primarily by the House of Rothchild, which of course has ties to the Puppet Master. In evaluating how much was spent during the bail-out, evaluate what would have been lost had the immense failure rate that was pending been allowed to happen. Think like a Puppet Master interested in keeping the system intact. Pay good money after bad? Yes, if the alternative is worse!
One would assume that the Puppermaster does indeed plan to support higher visibility of ZT and Nancy, per the Zetas and the current media posturing around Pole Shift related issues. Once things start to break open with 7 of 10 Quakes, PX visibility and validation of ZT predictions, will there still be a push for things like Chemtrails, PX topic blacklisting in media, "intimidation" of those in the know, etc.. by the "middle men" as the Zetas call them, or will they at that time resign themselves to "hide in their bunkers then"? How long will we have to fight against their disinfo and intimidation after things really start to break open? Agree that everybody or at least as many as possible should have knowledge and be able to make their own choices.
Will the cover-up intensify or weaken after the 7 of 10 and with more media exposure for the ZetaTalk message? It will do both. We have stated that those in charge of the cover-up are gripped in fear at the thought of the public becoming aware of their role, and coming after them for it. NASA's explanations for what is seen in the skies will become more inventive. They will get increased media coverage too. Their fear will be palpable, very evident, and their message shrill. Geologists will be mustered forth to talk about climate change and geological change over the eons, with the phrase "millions of years ago" thrown around frequently. When Planet X and its components becomes more visible in the skies, the reaction of those fogging up the skies with chemtrails is likely to be more fogging, at least at first. At the same time, those among the elite fearing panic in the public, or a backlash over the cover-up, will be increasingly heading for their bunkers. Thus the cover-up will lose strength, and eventually chemtrails will no longer be funded and NASA will prefer to close shop rather than defend its stance.
align="right" hspace="0" width=367 height=287>Could you identify this object that pass in front of the Sun? http://helioviewer.org/ Using this entry data: Date: 2010 12 06. Time: 2:56:00. Use Time step 1 min it enter of Camera at 2:57:00 from the right and move upwards, It finaly dissapear at 3:24:00.
[and from another] SOHO is 1 million miles out roughly and the moon is 1/4 that distance out, roughly. so it's not going to show in this manner on SOHO. [and from another] That is not SOHO, It is the AIA 304 camera of the SDO satellite, please see links below http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/mission/about.php [and from another] http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/potw.php?v=item&id=27 Pick of the Week for Oct. 15, 2010. Sun and Moon: This was a first for SDO and it was visually engaging too. On October 7, 2010, SDO observed its first lunar transit when the new Moon passed directly between the spacecraft (in its geosynchronous orbit) and the Sun. With SDO watching the Sun in a wavelength of extreme ultraviolet light, the dark Moon created a partial eclipse of the Sun.
The new SDO spacecraft is positioned sunside between the Earth and Moon, and thus can catch the Moon at New and Full positions, when it is where expected. Were the SDO positioned to either side of the Earth, so that the extreme tilt of the Moon's orbits these days were to be evident, the SDO team would have explaining to do. As it is, these are simply more images of the Sun's surface, with an occasional eclipse of the spacecraft by the Moon.
I have one question. Where will The epicenter of Japan's two M9+EQ be? Mariana trench or Philippines plate, place that Japan assume?
The folding of the Pacific (whereby the Marian Trench folds against the Mariana Plate, which folds against and under the Philippine Plate, which folds against and under the plate tongue holding Indonesia) will of course involve Japan in the shocks. How would this not be so? The Philippine Plate is also pushing under the south island of Japan, and the point of juncture at Mount Fiji, a three-plate boundary where the Pacific and Philippine plates slide past each other, will be a focus. The south island will have jolts as the Philippine Plate tilts and pushes under it, and Mount Fiji will also receive jolts as the Pacific Plate reverberates from having the Philippine Plate scrape along its side. These quakes we would place in the magnitude of 8, though they will be downgraded to be in the range of magnitude 7. The north island shocks will be worse, as the Pacific Plate is not going to tilt the way the Philippine Plate did, thus it will ram its way under the north island. Here is where the great shocks will occur, where they will unquestionably be called of a magnitude 8 but will in truth be more akin to magnitude 9 quakes.
align="bottom" width=757 height=253>
I am living currently in Germany in Hamburg and in Lucianópolis near Duartina and Bauru the state of Sao Paulo in Brazil. I note that Lucianópolis lies 500 m over the sea level and approx. 300 km from the coast and from the large city of Sao Paulo. I have there a chácara with tropical, subtropical and temperate trees and plants. The lowest winter minimum is +6°C, during the summer often very hot and humid, the climate is currently frostfree. But I read that the climate there will continue temperate in the Aftertime. I also see the map of the Aftertime, that the most parts of Argentina and Paraguay will be flooded and parts of the ocean, and Antartica will be tropical at the new Equator. Will the climate in Sao Paulo continue to be frostfree even in the winters in the Aftertime or there will be also snow and ice in Lucianópolis in the Aftertime in the winters, climate like in Germany today, snowy winters and warm temperate summers like Germany before the poleshift? Will be there one somewhat like the Gulf Stream from the tropical waters in the Antarctic area at the new Equator which might keep the climate of Sao Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul mild in the Aftertime like U.K. and Ireland before the poleshift so that palms will continue thriving in my yard in Lucianópolis and the climate will continue also frostfree? And also I don't find Hamburg under the Safe Lociations. What will happen with Hamburg and its citizens? I feel that Lucianópolis will have future, Hamburg not.
You have read enough of ZetaTalk to understand that the melt after the pole shift, which floods all lands to an approximate 675 mark above today's sea level, will
inundate much of Paraguary and Argentina, but not the coastal highlands of Brazil. You are apparently also aware of the New Geography map, which shows the
new Equator running through Antarctica. Using the New Geography map as a guide, the latitude of Sao Paulo will be approximately latitude 54, which is equivalent
to northern Canada or Finland. Recently in chat we have given the current position of the new S Pole to be 10°N and 78°E, for more precise computation of your
new climate. This is hardly a climate that will support tropical vegetation and would prove too cold even for most temperate vegetation. We stated that Sao Paulo
will be temperate, but this term covers a wide latitude. Technically, the temperate region runs from latitude 23.5 to 66.5.
Sao Paulo will prove to be temperate, in our view, primarily because of its proximity to the coastlines and the moderating effect of the ocean on the temperature of land near oceans. California does not freeze as Colorado, just to the east, nor does the UK freeze to the same degree as countries inland to the east or Newfoundland on the Canadian coastline. Warm water will curl up from the new Equator, and will not be blocked from washing against the former coastline of Brazil. Nevertheless, Brazil in the main will freeze. The state of Minas Gerais in Brazil, your neighbor, will be freezing. Your desire to have your palm trees survive is an example of wishful thinking, where you desire to continue your pleasant life in the new Sao Paulo, and thus refuse to let your new latitude register.
This story http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101202/sc_nm/us_arsenic_bacteria (December 2nd 2010) is about NASA's scientists suggesting the discovery of a new kind of life form in Mono Lake (Eastern California), that can absorb arsenic. Now (December 8), this http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101208/sc_yblog_thelookout/scientists-poking-holes-in-nasas-arsenic-eating-microbe-discovery about scientist's attacking NASA's bad science on the so-called arsenic eating microbe. Would the Zetas care to comment on NASA's motives as to putting out such a story with apparently dubious science?
For NASA to have laid themselves open to ridicule by established scientists shows how rattled and demoralized the agency has become. We have mentioned that
those at NASA were chosen for their ability to follow rules without thinking, and to have tunnel vision. This allows them to see space ships and Planet X and not
question the cover-up. It also requires in the main the type of person who is not strong or well grounded, but rather the type of individual who expects to be cared
for like a child. When the parent starts to put the child in untenable positions, as members of NASA have been by being the primary spokespersons for
disinformation about Planet X, they become unhinged. Instances of astronauts crossing the country in diapers on a vendetta and shootouts in front of CNN
personnel are examples of this.
NASA is used to being able to say anything they wish, as no one would challenge them. Their purview was space, what the Hubble brought in, and what they chose to tell mankind about what their equipment observed. They are, thus, not only immature but arrogant, in the main. They have not had good press of late, with the Shuttle program failing and having to be rescued by the Russians for trips to the ISS. The stress on those used to the fawning press having to explain evidence of Planet X on their SOHO and Stereo images has taken its tole. Thus, they rushed to press with an experiment that was terran bound, bacteria from Mono Lake. They should have stayed where no terran scientist could follow, among their secrets and their privileges. Now they have been exposed for what they are! Liars!
align="bottom" width=517 height=515>
Many members of this ning are enthusiastically following the daily updates provided at this link: http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/breaking-news-with-est-px Today one of our members has discovered a significant image at this URL: http://secchi.nrl.navy.mil/sccimages/index.php?subdir=HI_A/20101207/1024&nothumb=1 We do believe that it clearly shows the PX complex, its dust cloud and several PX moons. We would as always appreciate the comment from the zetas and from you.
This link is deceptive as the title shows 2010 but the images displayed as examples are from May 16, 2007 at 4:50 UTC. However, the Stereo Ahead image for
12/7/2010 at 13:29 UTC does indeed show a similar blaze of light on the right hand side of the Stereo Ahead image. Why would NASA make such a switch? In
2007 here was a CME visible from the Stereo Ahead satellite, which would account for the blaze of light on the right. In 2010 such a CME was missing. Thus, by
substituting the 2007 images in the center of this 2010 page, as examples, they would have a ready response to any member of the public noticing that there is no
CME to account for this in 2010. The answer would be "oh, that was an image from 2007". This is deliberate deception on the part of NASA, once again.
So given that a blaze of light to the right on the Stereo Ahead image would not be accounted for by a CME, what is it? Only recently on November 28, 2010 Planet X was caught on the Stereo Ahead being to the left in the image. Could the Stereo Ahead satellites moved along in the Earth's orbit that far, in only a week, to be appearing on the right? In examining the images provided for December 7, 2010 from the Stereo Ahead satellite, this blaze is moving rapidly from right to left. Consider where the Earth and Planet X are in relation to the Stereo satellites, as shown in the recent depiction done by Nancy. The great tail of Planet X can waft many miles, and if Planet X itself can catch a glinter of Sunlight and reflect this back to the Stereo Ahead satellite, so can a great clump of matter within the vast tail of Planet X. This is what has been captured, and what NASA is attempting to hide.
align="bottom" width=777 height=516>