link to Home Page

Lou Gentile Show (Part 2)
December 23, 2004
Nancy only taped her side of the Interview.
The complete interview is available on the Lou Gentile web site, to subscribed members.
A brief paraphrase of the question or comment made by Lou has been inserted.
The first half of the Interview was discussing the content of the web page prepared for the show, content at the link
This is a long interview, on more than one web page, continuing links to next page at bottom.

LOU: [Announcements, back from break.]

NANCY: Hey, hi, and before we run out of time, because I know you want to take phone calls. Something showed up on SWAN during the month of November, since our last update. Someone called my attention to this. Now SWAN is a SOHO image that, I guess it looks at different ray frequencies. It measured photons, hydrogen glow, and ultraviolet. And because the Sun casts its light to the backside of the Sun against various clouds in the solar system, which bounces back toward the satellite, the SOHO satellite, it gets a 360 panoramic view. In other words, you see what the image of these wave lengths is from the front of the Sun and wrapping around from the back of the Sun. Somebody sent this to me excitedly and said ‘oh, I see a dot, it’s moving’. And they have something called a Comet Tracker view, where you can see comets that are reflecting the Sun’s light, bounced back, backlit. And sure enough it turned out that one of the lights that was moving over this 4 week period from November 4 to November 25, I have those images that were made available from the archives of SWAN, you can see it moving. And in discussions on the message board somebody nicely identified that comet and the RA and the Dec look appropriate for that comet. But there’s something close to the Ecliptic, just a hair under the Ecliptic, which remains stationary during this month. Now the Sun turns and rotates once every, I think it’s once every 27 or 28 days, I believe, per SWAN, that’s their statement. Now this is not rotating, it’s completely stationary. And on the web page that I’ve prepared for tonight’s discussion, people can go and check, look at the website and click on the Lou! on the right-hand side and it’s there with links to more detail. You can see that stationary object, yet the Sun, in comparison, is rotating where you can see the solar flares, and the hot spots and the cool spots moving.

What is this hot spot? Well the Zetas have said that Planet X is so difficult to see because it’s shrouded by dust, like a fog bank, it’s between us and the Sun, and mostly the light that hits it from the Sun bounces right back to the Sun. Well this is the backlit view, and there it is! Now, guess what, SWAN went down immediately after I put this on the web, and has not been updating since. It’s been a month. I wanted to point out that Planet X is a smoldering brown dwarf, and it’s not one of these things that is supposed to be several times as large as Jupiter. It doesn’t fit a classification that NASA gives us. It’s as small as a planet, and compact. It’s not lit like a Sun but it does emit heat and light. So therefore, what we’re seeing on the backlit, against SWAN, could be sunlight, or all the emissions from the Sun bounced back, as they do with a comet, or it could be emissions from Planet X. So basically on SWAN, it’s showing you non-visible spectrums: photons and hydrogen glow and ultraviolet. And infrared was one of the major means by which it was identified in 1983 when NASA and JPL went up to look for it in an infrared bubble above the atmosphere, and found it. It hit the front page Dec 31, 1983 in the Washington Post. And it’s something that the Zetas said you would see it coming in from the direction of Orion in 2001 and 2002 and in 2002 we were capturing it in infrared and it was right spot on where the Zetas said it would be, and etc. And it {SWAN} even made the website posting that all kinds of websites that were looking at the Sun in infrared or ultraviolet and various wave lengths like that, have suddenly gone down. Right after I put this information on the web. So, just a curiosity.

Now the other thing I wanted to bring up, which I’m sure might not be news to many people who have their eye on what might be going on. A lot of meteors, a lot of fireballs, but oh my, the ISS is apparently going to be evacuated. Now they’re saying ‘ach, we’ve run out of food, we’re supposed to have a 45 day reserve, but our guys are going to be running out of food shortly after January 1, the first week or two, and if this food pod, this shuttle that’s going up around Christmas doesn’t get there, something goes amiss, they’ll have to come home’. Everybody said ‘huh? they didn’t keep track of their food supplies?’ At the same time, we’re having a lot of satellites that are getting zinged down. They just disappear, or they go malfunctional. One is a Tristar 7, it serviced a lot of commercial internet users. One of the GOES, GOES 3, went out about a week and a half ago or so, and GeoSat 1 went out, which was a military, went out. And everybody looked very distressed. Sean O’Keefe suddenly resigned, within days, and looking like I never remembered seeing him. I remember him as a very confident, diplomatic person, and he looks like somebody who’s lost an awful lot of sleep and has been hitting the bottle. Just ragged. And watched his exit interviews, and he looks like it must be heck there, at NASA, asked to do the impossible, asked to maintain the cover-up, and like somebody who just doesn’t want to do it anymore.

So an interesting piece of related information, is that in the Hopi prophecy, prophecy of the Bear Clan, they gave their ninth and last sign as, and I’m quoting here, ‘you will hear of a dwelling place in the heavens, above the Earth, that will fall with a great crash. These are the signs that great destruction is coming and the world will rock to and fro’. In fact, the ISS not only had an oxygen leak, which everyone thought must have been because it got zinged by something that it dealt with, but its descending and losing its altitude faster than what was expected. The explanation given was that it had something to do with magnetism, but the bottom line is, it’s coming down and they’re talking about taking people out. So, interesting note of the current times, and interesting relationship to the Hopi prophecy.

And the last thing I want to touch on is something about the Earth wobble, which we’ve had with us, in one way or the other, since last May. It’s taken on a different form just recently, after end of October, early November, which the Zetas call a polar wobble. Instead of the N. Pole being pulled toward Planet X as it’s lying along the magnetic flow lines of the Sun, the N. Pole is being pushed away. So it’s forming a Figure 8 because it doesn’t really line up with our geographic pole. Sometimes it’s presenting to the Sun and sometimes it’s behind. Lots of documentation on my website in the orbits section. People’s reports of where they find the Sun, too far North, too far South. And I myself add to that. I find the Sun about 7-10 degrees to far North at sunrise and about 14-22 degrees too far South at sunset, pretty consistently. And some of this photographic evidence, like somebody saying ‘how can Dec 21 have been the Solstice when it’s supposed to be an even arch across the sky’ and according to photographic evidence on SpaceWeather, compared to a prior year, this is not an even arch.

LOU: [How come all these people who channel Zetas don’t get along.]

NANCY: Hey, hi. Well, I get along with Lysa Royal, who is a genuine channel.

LOU: [There’s about 50-60 of them.]

NANCY: No kidding. I do know that there’s a lot of wannabees that popped up after ZetaTalk first started, because it was so successful. There were websites that were saying ‘pose your questions to the Zetas we’ll answer them’ and the like. If there are that many, I don’t even know about them. My bottom line, when people ask me about this or that, I say ‘look, I do ZetaTalk. I don’t have time to go and familiarize myself with the others’. But what we have said is, if they don’t have an accuracy prediction track record that you can point to, you have to assume they’re just hot air. If they say they’re talking to so and so, how do you know they are? Now one of the things that’s made ZetaTalk, as I’ve mentioned, so renowned, is that it does have this track record. They were the only ones, for instance, talking about the weather in 1995, what would happen, and it’s laid out just like that. But there are dozens, and probably hundreds, if I would bother to gather all the documentation together, of instances where they’ve made a statement and it’s come about. And this is why it has the fan club that it does. I don’t even know who those guys are, but lets assume that they’re all stage hogs, and they want to get on the stage, and they want to grab the mike, but none of them really has that compelling aspect that ZetaTalk does, where people say ‘wow, it has the ring of truth, it scares me, I’m not really sure about it but I want to hear what they have to say. I’m looking. I’m thinking.’ You know, it sounds like of childish, doesn’t it, if they’re all just squabbling with each other?

Page 3